Are you familiar with the formula for determining your maximum heart rate by subtracting your age from 220? The formula may be written: 220 – AGE = HRmax.
If you know a person’s maximum heart rate, you can thereby deduce the person’s age by rearranging the formula as: 220 – HRmax = AGE.
Today in one of the workout sessions my heart rate maxed out at 204, therefore today it was acting very juvenile. To be precise, it was acting 220-204= sixteen years old. I was so focused on the effort during that 2,000 meter SkiErg piece, that I didn’t notice how high my teeny-bopper heart rate reached until afterwards. After uploading the results, I looked at the graphs closely, the way the Concept 2 online logbook lets you do if you use their app (ErgData) and it if it was wirelessly connected to the SkiErg monitor during the session.
In total there were five sessions today, which were in this chronological order, one right after the other. A summary list of the workouts is below, (but I will only include data/graph screenshots for three of them):
Today’s workouts had orderly heart behavior compared to yesterday. The workouts were: a SkiErg session of 182 Calories, a rowing session of 1,000 meters at 2:4.7/500 meters and a super-slow 10K rowing session with average pace of 3:26 including a couple of breaks.
A little chaos is part of the spice of life and is probably so by divine design. But today’s measure of chaos seemed a bit too much. Today’s workout was bothered by excessive chaos of the heart, which has been assigned the medical label “paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.”
If I hadn’t been wearing a heart strap while using the Concept 2 ergs, I might not have noticed it, because it felt a little fluttery but nothing I would notice if my mind was focused elsewhere such as on some physical activity, reading a book, playing a game etc.
But I was wearing a heart strap and its display showed that the little fluttery feeling was correlated with heart rate being too high. When it was regular enough to be displayed. The rest of the time, heart rate was not displayed and unknown.
Today’s plan was for there to be 3 workout sessions. The first was going to be 181 Calories on the SkiErg at a pace of 2:21. But because heart rate was climbing much too high for the effort level, I cut the first session short after 80 calories and took a break, so heart rate could settle. Heart rate didn’t settle, so I did the remainder of the SkiErg workout as a 100 Calorie session, at 2:21 pace. Those two sessions added up to the day’s goal of 181 Calories on the SkiErg.
The rowing workout was a pair of sessions: The first one was the moderately fun session: 1,000 meters at 2:06. The second rowing session was 10,000 meters at an extremely slow pace while I watched a documentary I wanted to see about purifying water.
During both rowing sessions heart rate was very irregular. Other than that, everything was normal. By “everything was normal,” I mean that if I’d talked with a cardiologist about it, as I have about previous episodes of “heart strangeness,” there would have been questions such as “did you feel any chest pains, tightness or shortness of breath?” My answer would have been “No, I was breathing very easy, virtually the same as if I’d not been working out.” None of the workouts done today were hard enough and/or long enough to even make me sweat.
The only session recorded for my YouTube channel today was the 1K. That 1,000 meter session was recorded for those of my 19 subscribers (at last count) and others who would like to row along with it. It is available as a screen recording on YouTube at: Indoor Rowing 1000 meters at 2min 6sec pace 07202019
Today’s total available workout time was too little, so one of the workouts had to be shortened. The one chosen was the rowing session. It was limited to 1K, but a little compensation was made by increasing the pace to 2:08. The SkiErg session was the same progression as recently. I added one to yesterday’s Calorie goal and subtracted one second/500 meters from the pace belonging to yesterday’s pace target.*
Today the decision was made to discontinue the 7-day series of 10Ks and increase the pace of today’s 10K from the 2:14 pace which was only done in one session (yesterday’s session) to a bit faster 2:13 / 500 meters.
A pace boat was used to help me maintain a constant pace from start to finish. I gave the name Gertrude to the avatar of the female rower in the pace boat.
The most notable thing about today’s rowing session wasn’t the pace boat or it’s lovely female rower, however. The most notable thing was the lack of any heart strangeness. The reason I was so impressed with the good behavior of my heart today was because of what I was watching on another monitor while rowing today’s 10K.
The other monitor was playing a YouTube recording of an online 10K I rowed on September 30th, 2018. That particular 10K was done at an overall average pace of 2:14.2/500 meters which was slower than today’s average pace of 2:13.0/500 meters. But my heart rate was a LOT higher on Sept 30 of last year than it was in today’s 10K. So it appears that the heart is functioning better now than it was a year ago in September. I wonder if it is related to my significantly improving A1C score?? When the A1 C score improves, the red blood cells become smaller, closer to the size they should be. Could it be that larger red blood cells are more difficult for the heart to pump?
There were differences in the approach to the 10K on Sept 30, 2018: I started out faster and tried to maintain a pace of about 2:08 on that day. But by the time the distance counted down to less than 3,000 meters I could hear myself, on the recording audio track, breathing very hard. At 2,800 meters, I was struggling for breath and finally threw in the figurative towel. I finished that Sept 30, 2018 10K, but at an extremely slow pace.
Today’s workout also included a session on the SkiErg which was 178 Calories at a pace of 2:24/500 meters.
I very seldom get comments. There have been a few, very few, comments but the only ones lately have been in Russian. When I use Google translator to render the Russian into some resemblance to English, they turn out to be spam which I won’t dignify with a description.
Comments welcome, but only if they are on a topic shared by this blog (indoor rowing or the SkiErg, etc). No Russian spoken here, though.
Today’s workouts were two: A 10K rowing session, the 6th in a series of 7 at a pace of 2:14. Also there was a SkiErg session which had as its goal 175 Calories at a pace of 2:27.
It’s late at night, 22:00 local time and I’m wondering how quickly this blog post can be posted. Here goes…
Today’s erg workouts were: 10K rowing at a constant average pace of 2:15. This was the 5th in a series of seven 10Ks to be done at that pace. Also there was a SkiErg session, same as yesterday’s except that one more Calorie was added to the session goal and the target pace was increased by -1 second per 500 meters.
When I took a few days off from using the ergs, I thought it had only been three or four days. I was surprised, to discover that six days had passed, when workouts resumed. How did time get so slippery?
So now I’m counting the days-in-a-row of doing daily workouts. Today makes a three day streak of workouts on rowing machine and SkiErg.
Today’s rowing was another 10K, the 4th in a series of seven at a constant pace of 2:15/500 meters. The workout on the SkiErg was 173 Calories at an average pace of 2:29/500 meters.
Today’s 10K was the 7th of 7 with goal of: Rating 28, constant pace and average pace of 2:17. Heart rate behaved normally during both rowing and its sister-workout of 162 calories on the SkiErg. Tomorrow’s 10K will have goal of everything the same except average pace of 2:16 instead of 2:17.
The SkiErg session today was similar, with a goal of: No particular stroke rate, constant pace and average pace of 2:40. Tomorrow’s will be targeting average pace of 2:39.