Today’s main rowing was 60 minutes at “overdistance” pace. It was done online. There was no screen recording made of it, but a screen recording was made of the 2K supplemental that followed it.
The 2K was done with a target pace of 2:15. For those of you who’d like to row-along with the 2K, its screen recording link is here: Indoor Rowing 2K in 9 minutes 12062018
I was looking forward to the rowing session today. It was a 6,000 meter piece and the plan was to row at about 2:06 until the last 500 meters and then row faster to the finish. If all had gone according to plan, the 6K would have been done in about 25 minutes or less. But the plan assumed regular heart rhythm.
And today, for whatever reason it has not shared with me, my heart was a spoilsport and began acting erratically after 4 or 5 minutes of rowing. Everything felt fine and I might not have known anything was irregular, if it had not been for the heart strap. When heart rate spiked from around 130 to 180, I decided to slow down and let the heart computer* sort things out in its programming pathways and circuits. After 20 something minutes, the rhythm settled down to what seemed like normal. But by then there was no chance of finishing the piece in 25 minutes or less, according to the original hopeful plan. So I picked up the pace a little bit but kept it very easy from there until the finish.
After finishing the 6K, I did another 1K, to bring the grand total up to the day’s minimum distance goal of 10K.
Today’s rowing session was the third day in a row in which I boldly included a small degree of relatively intensive (for me) rowing. The reason I have been so bold is because I recently ordered a device which will enable me to get a daily reading of Heart Rate Variability, to use as a “coach”, “guide” or whatever analogy you’d like to use for the biomarker or medical “signpost” provided by the day to day trend of HRV.
Before learning about HRV, I had backed off from and mostly avoided rowing very hard, lest I overdo it and cause injury of some sort. But after reading about and watching video talks about HRV, it looks like the answer to that problem. If properly used, the cumulative analysis of daily HRV readings can tell if a person is stressed to the point where rest is needed.
Today’s session was 30 minutes online in the company of several others who were located in the US and Europe. Though I finished a distant last place compared to all the others, I rowed at what was for me a relatively intensive pace compared to what has been typical for quite a while. It felt good.
For those of you who would like to row-along with today’s session, a screen recording has been uploaded and is available at this link: Indoor Rowing 30 mins online and WD 12042018
Today’s indoor rowing consisted of four pieces, in this chronological order: 30 minutes online with a training partner, 1K online warm down, 2K offline with a RowPro paceboat (a RowPro 5 for the Mac bug was uncovered during this session) and a 500 meter warm down.
The 30 minute piece was done at a pace that was determined by the other rower, who was aiming for a constant heart rate of between 80% and 85% of his maximum heart rate, to make it an AT session for him. So his rowing pace slowed gradually through the 30 minutes, to keep his heart rate fairly constant. I paced him and my heart rate remained fairly constant. The 1K warm down was done at a pace of about 2:28. The 2K was done at a pace of 2:06 for the first 1,500 meters and then faster for the final 500. The 500 meter warm down was done super slow.
Today’s indoor rowing consisted of 3 pieces. But I have little time to spare to blog about them so I will just share a little but not “all” like usual. If you want to see more, say so in comments and I will return another day to edit and add more screenshots.
The first and main piece was 10K done online with company, at an overdistance pace. The 2nd piece was 2K done at 2:07 until the last 400 meters when I indulged in what was for me a little bit of intensive rowing. The 3rd piece was an extremely leisurely 1,700 meters, to reach a goal in the current Concept 2 challenge.
A screen recording was made of the 10K but it hasn’t been uploaded to YouTube and won’t be unless one of you readers asks for it. A screen recording was made of the 2K and is available here: Indoor rowing 2K 12022018
Today’s main rowing session was 10K with a target heart rate of 123 BPM. That target was chosen because it is the top end of what is assumed to be my “UT2 training band”.
If a target heart rate is specified with RowPro, it paints a target zone on the screen. To make that target zone a bit wider than what would have been a horizontal line for 123 BPM, I specified a lower value of 120 and upper value of 126, then tried to keep the HR line in the middle of that area while rowing. It sounds easy, but sometimes the heart behaves a bit illogically and takes a dive though the effort level is unchanged. Or should I say, though I didn’t perceive the effort level to have changed? The heart did that a few times, so I had to spike the effort when it acted that way, to bring it right back up into the painted zone. Each time I spiked the effort, heart rate would sort of reluctantly climb back up into the zone, then I would slow down but it would usually overshoot the zone anyway, so I’d have to slow down even more.
It reminded me of the idiom, “herding cats,” which also inspired today’s title.
The above photo of a dog who seems intent on herding a cat who appears intent on ignoring the dog was found on the website/blog called To Breathe Is To Write.
Today’s indoor rowing consisted of two pieces. The first was 10K done with steady-state effort at an average pace of 2:23. The second was a 2K done the same way but at an average pace of 2:15.
A screen recording was made of the 10K and it will be available for those of you who want to row-along. It’s link will be active in a few hours from now at this location: Indoor Rowing 10K Online with Canada 11302018
Today’s indoor rowing consisted of two pieces. The first and main one was 10K done online in the company of America, Canada and England-located rowers. That 10K was done by me at a pace which some describe as a combination of pace and % heart rate maximum which classifies it as “overdistance”. At any rate, it felt easy and good.
The second piece was 2K done offline as a warm down, at variable paces.
There is no screen recording of the 10K because it didn’t occur to me until after we started rowing and I didn’t want to interrupt the flow of things. There is, however, a screen recording of the 2K warm down. It was done at widely varying paces but none of the paces was held constant for more than a second or two. The link for that recording, if you’d like to row-along with it, is here: Indoor Rowing Warm Up or Warm Down Mixup 11292018
Today’s rowing session was 10K online in the company of another rower who is in the same “ballpark” of rowing capability as me. He rowed a steady state pace, after rowing a bit faster at the start to raise his heart rate to where he wanted it. I paced him. By very subjective “perceived effort,” I categorized today’s session as a little bit more than “easy” and therefore it is categorized as “medium”. That’s only relative to me, of course. Your perceived effort will vary, depending on your age, conditioning etc.
A screen recording was made for those of you who’d like to row-along with the session. It will be available a few hours from the time this is posted, at this link: Indoor Rowing 10K and WD online 11282018
Today’s session was 10K. It was scheduled yesterday but no other RowPro-enabled rowers were available to join so it was done solo.
After 15 minutes, I varied the pace a little faster, for 4 minutes, then 3 minutes slower and repeated that for a total of 4 cycles.
The thing I found the most interesting about today’s rowing session was the resulting graph of heart rate per split, the way the two lines stayed so very close to each other throughout their session graph.
That particular chart usually looks more like it did yesterday. I’m inserting yesterday’s HR/Split chart above today’s, so you can see the difference.