Today’s indoor rowing consisted of two pieces. The first and main one was 10K done online in the company of America, Canada and England-located rowers. That 10K was done by me at a pace which some describe as a combination of pace and % heart rate maximum which classifies it as “overdistance”. At any rate, it felt easy and good.
The second piece was 2K done offline as a warm down, at variable paces.
There is no screen recording of the 10K because it didn’t occur to me until after we started rowing and I didn’t want to interrupt the flow of things. There is, however, a screen recording of the 2K warm down. It was done at widely varying paces but none of the paces was held constant for more than a second or two. The link for that recording, if you’d like to row-along with it, is here: Indoor Rowing Warm Up or Warm Down Mixup 11292018
Today’s rowing session was 10K online in the company of another rower who is in the same “ballpark” of rowing capability as me. He rowed a steady state pace, after rowing a bit faster at the start to raise his heart rate to where he wanted it. I paced him. By very subjective “perceived effort,” I categorized today’s session as a little bit more than “easy” and therefore it is categorized as “medium”. That’s only relative to me, of course. Your perceived effort will vary, depending on your age, conditioning etc.
A screen recording was made for those of you who’d like to row-along with the session. It will be available a few hours from the time this is posted, at this link: Indoor Rowing 10K and WD online 11282018
Today’s session was 10K. It was scheduled yesterday but no other RowPro-enabled rowers were available to join so it was done solo.
After 15 minutes, I varied the pace a little faster, for 4 minutes, then 3 minutes slower and repeated that for a total of 4 cycles.
The thing I found the most interesting about today’s rowing session was the resulting graph of heart rate per split, the way the two lines stayed so very close to each other throughout their session graph.
That particular chart usually looks more like it did yesterday. I’m inserting yesterday’s HR/Split chart above today’s, so you can see the difference.
Sleep schedule discombobulation resulted in a very late sleep-in today. Though I prefer to row in the a.m., p.m. is better than skipping yet another day, so I scheduled an online session for this afternoon at 4 p.m. local time. Happily, there was one other rower for whom that was a workable time to row and he joined the session.
The other rower inspired me to go a little bit faster. I watched as his lead increased and wondered if I could row at a pace fast enough to keep his lead to less than 1,000 meters by the time he finished. When it became certain that wouldn’t happen, I decided to change my goal for the session to keeping his lead to less than 1,100 meters by the time he finished. It resulted in a season best 10K time for me, but no change in my placement in the Concept 2 online logbook rankings.
Today’s rowing session was an experiment or perhaps more of an exercise in curiosity. I noticed that one of my training partners had rowed a fixed distance of a non-standard number of meters. Instead of rowing a fixed distance of 100, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 6000, 10,000 meters or one of the two odd but common distances of 21,097 or 42,195 meters, he had rowed the fixed distance of 6,861 meters. I’ve done quite a few fixed distance session of non-standard and therefore “odd” distances, but I’ve assumed myself to be in the minority.
Anyway… one thought led to another when I was looking at the summary results of his 6,861 meter rowing session and the result was that I had the idea to row the same distance today, to find out how my ending heart rate compared to his. Every person’s body is different from everyone else’s in myriad and countless mostly micro-organism, micro-structural ways… so there really isn’t any point to compare two people in that way unless one person happens to be a clone of the other as in the movie Multiplicity (my favorite movie about cloning) … but I thought it would make for an interesting rowing session, regardless.
When I told wifey about my plans for today’s rowing session, she immediately said, “That would be comparing apples and oranges! How tall is he?” I readily admitted that what she said was true. He and I are not the same height, same age, and there are probably a virtually infinite number of differences between us if you want to venture considerations into the microscopic dimensionality (is that a word? spell checker thinks not…) of comparisons… But the most important and main point was that it would be different, doable and definitely fun.
It was. Fun. My heart rate was quite a bit higher than his, for the same average pace, for whatever that is worth. My heart tried to do something irregular a couple times during the session, which the heart strap transmitter couldn’t translate into a meaningful heart rate, but most of the time it worked okay.
The session was screen-recorded for those who want to row-along with it. The screen recording link will be active less than an hour from now and is located here: Indoor Rowing Fixed Distance 6861 meters 11242018
Today’s rowing was 10K online in the virtual company of a few other rowers.
I was going to do 4 intervals of 4 minutes each but had to stop doing intervals after the second one, because heart rate became irregular. Otherwise everything was okay.
The session was recorded for anyone who wants to row-along. The recording will be available later today at this link: Indoor Rowing Thanksgiving 10K 11222018
Today’s indoor rowing session was another 10K. It was done online with a rower in Germany who goes by the screen name of Tommy. Tommy rowed fast and finished faster, which greatly helped to keep me motivated.
Today’s session was 10K done online in the company of another rower whose steadfast (and faster) pace helped inspire me.
I once again did the thing with 4×4 minute R 3 minute intervals, beginning 15 minutes after the start of the 10K. during the before and after and recovery intervals, I aimed for a pace of about 2:20.
What was stepped up was the 4 minute portion of the four sets of intervals. Instead of aiming for a pace of about 2:10 during those, I aimed for a pace closer to 2:05. During the very last of those 4 minute intervals, when the other rower was doing a sprint to the finish, I increased my pace and extended that interval a little bit beyond 4 minutes, until the other guy crossed the finish line. His faster pace and sprint to the finish inspired me to do a little more.
The session was screen-recorded for those who’d like to use it for rowing-along-with and its link is here: Indoor Rowing Online 10K 11192018
Actually, I didn’t want to do a half marathon today. How I feel after today’s HM, including how I sleep tonight, will help to decide whether I do any more half marathons this season.
Last night I logged on to Oarbits Live Feed (the online rowing website) with the intention of scheduling a 10K session for 07:00 (7:00 a.m.). There was already an online session scheduled for that time, but it was a half marathon. I joined it instead of scheduling a 10K, because there were already two people signed up for it and therefore by joining the HM I was virtually guaranteed to have some virtual company.
That’s what makes rowing online so worthwhile: the virtual company of other REAL PEOPLE who are also rowing the same session. You can watch their pace and other information about each other rower and empathize with them. And they can do likewise.
I entered today’s half marathon results in the Concept 2 online world ranking for this season, since it is the only HM I’ve done this season and is therefore my best HM so far this season…
This 10K was rowed online in the company of a rower in Germany and a rower in Ohio. Each person rowed it differently. For me, the first 15 minutes was done at a warmup pace of about 2:20 and then I did 4×4 minutes @ 2:10 R3 minutes @ 2:20.